编辑： 来源： 时间：2024-03-10 访问：次
OECIS DP Academic Integrity Policy
国际学校大学预科段学术诚实政策
Philosophy/理念
OECIS believes that acting with honesty and integrity at all times is vital to healthy teaching and learning engagements. Guided by the philosophy of the IB, OECIS expects all members of the school community to develop, promote and maintain ethical qualities of personal honesty and academic integrity .
国际学校认为，诚实守信对健康的教育教学活动是非常重要的。按照国际文凭理念的指导，国际学校期望学校社区的所有成员都应该致力于发展、提倡、维持个人守信和学术诚实的优良道德品质。
OECIS understands that a holistic education is attained under demanding circumstances that promote, and expect honest intellectual engagements. We also believe that producers of original works deserve the right to be, and are legally entitled to be acknowledged. Therefore, OECIS expects all diploma students to embrace the principles of academic integrity and personal honesty as they learn, discuss and share ideas. Our expectations are guided by the following attributes of the IB learner profile:
国际学校了解到只有在勤奋努力的环境下诚实地提升智力，才能达到素质教育。我们也认同原创者的权利。因而，国际学校期望所有的大学预科段学生在学习与讨论想法时候可以遵循学习学术诚实和个人守信的规定。我们按照国际文凭培养者目标对学生进行培养与指导：
Inquirers: Students develop their natural curiosity. They acquire the skills necessary to conduct inquiry and research, and show independence in learning. They actively enjoy learning and this love of learning will be sustained throughout their lives.
勤于探究：培养发展自己天生的好奇心，学习掌握开展探索和研究的必要技能，并在学习的过程中显示出独立自主性。学生积极主动、热爱学习，这种好学的品质将伴随他们的一生。
Knowledgeable: Students explore concepts, ideas, and issues that have local and global significance. In so doing, they acquire in-depth knowledge and develop understanding across a broad and balanced range of disciplines.
知识渊博:学生探索各种与当地或全球有关的重要概念、思想观点和问题。在探索的过程中，学习掌握精深的知识，并发展对广泛而均衡的各个学科的综合理解。
Principled: Students act with integrity and honesty, with a strong sense of fairness, justice and respect for the dignity of the individual, groups and communities. They take responsibility for their own action and the consequences that accompany them.
坚持原则：学生要处事正直、诚实，有强烈的公平和正义感，尊重个人、集体和社会群体的尊严，对自己的行动及其后果承担责任。
Reflective: They give thoughtful consideration to their own learning and experience. They are able to assess and understand their strengths and limitations in order to support their learning and personal development.
善于反思：学生对自己的学习和经历做出缜密的思考。为了有助于自己的学习和个人发展他们能够评估和了解自己的长处和局限性。
Objectives of the policy/政策目标：
The objectives of this policy are: 本政策目标如下：
to share the meaning and importance of academic integrity 共同分享学术诚实的意义和重要性；
to promote good academic practice and a school culture that actively encourages academic integrity 积极鼓励良好的学术行为和倡导学术诚实的校园文化；
to introduce how the school ensures the integrity of IB examinations and assessments. 介绍学校如何保证IB考试和评估的真实性；
to give examples of what constitute plagiarism, collusion, and duplication 举例说明什么是作弊和抄袭行为；
to make known the possible consequences of academic misconduct and the actions that will be taken by IB when a candidate is suspected and confirmed of academic misconduct 使学生明白，学术不诚实可能会有什么后果；对可能涉嫌并确认作弊的考生，国际文凭组织会采取何种行为；
to encourage the full acknowledgement of the words and ideas of others in all works produced by the students 鼓励在学生的作品中，完全承认他人的观点和言语；
to explain to students their responsibilities in ensuring their works are authentic and devoid of unacknowledged sources 给学生解释他们的职责是保证自己的作品是原创，并避免引文未注明出处。
What’s Academic Integrity?/学术诚信是什么?
Academic integrity refers to:/学术诚信是指：
proper conduct in relation to the conduct of examinations/按照考试规定进行考试；
a set of values and skills that promote personal integrity and good practice in teaching, learning, and assessment/一系列促进个人诚信的价值观和技巧，以及在教育、学习和评估中的良好的实践；
the full acknowledgement of the original authorship and ownership of creative material cited from the Internet, CD-Rom, books, magazines and journals /承认引用如网络、光碟，报刊杂志等文字的原作者原创性和对创造性资料的所有权；
the production of authentic pieces of work/保证创造作品的真实性；
the protection of all forms of intellectual property - which include forms of intellectual and creative expression, as well as patents, registered designs, trademarks, moral rights and copyright/保护所有形式的智力资产，包含各种形式的智力和原创性的表述，专利、已注册的设计、商标、道德许可及版权。
Academic Misconduct /学术不端的行为
The IB defines student academic misconduct as deliberate or inadvertent behaviour that has the potential to result in the student, or anyone else, gaining an unfair advantage in one or more components of assessment. Behaviour that may disadvantage another student is also regarded as academic misconduct. It also includes any act that potentially threatens the integrity of IB examinations and assessments that happens before, during or after the completion of the assessment or examination, paper-based or on-screen. This includes behaviour in school, out of school, and online. (Academic integrity policy, Page 3)
国际文凭组织为学术不端定义如下：任何故意或者无意的、可能会导致其他学生或者其他任何人在一项或者多项评估中得到不公平优势的行为。可能对另一名学生不利的行为也被视为学术不端。它还包括在评估或考试完成之前、期间或之后发生的任何可能威胁IB考试和评估完整性的行为，无论是纸质的还是屏幕上的。这包括校内、校外和网上的行为。（《学术诚实政策》第3页）
Academic misconduct includes (Academic integrity policy, Page 22, 30-46):
学术不端包含以下不同形式（《学术诚实政策》第22页、第30-46页）：
plagiarism: this is defined as the representation, intentionally or unwittingly, of the ideas, words or work of another person without proper, clear, and explicit acknowledgement. /剽窃：定义为将他人观点或者文章表述为自己原创的
collusion: this is defined as supporting malpractice by another candidate, as in allowing one’s work to be copied or submitted for assessment by another/串通作弊：定义为其他考生从旁支持不当行为的，让别人摘抄或提交自己的文章以做评估用的。
duplication of work: this is defined as the presentation of the same work for different assessment components and/or diploma requirements/文章重复：定义为不同评估部分或者应文凭的相关要求而多次引用同一篇文章的。
misconduct during an IB examination, such as: /在考试中的不端行为，如
-- using own rough paper and notes during exams/在考试中用自己带的演草纸或者夹带笔记的；
-- referring to or attempting to refer to unauthorized material that is related to the examination/在考试中使用或试图使用未经许可的资料；
-- using unauthorized electronic gadgets such as mobile phones, cameras, and iPads during an examination /在考试中未经许可而使用的电子设备如手机、相机、平板电脑。
-- concealing and/or using unauthorized software on a graphic calculator during examinations /在考试中使用留有其他信息或装有未经许可的软件的图形计算器。
-- misbehaving during an exam, including any attempt to disrupt the examination or distract other candidates/在考试中行为失当，包含试图或打扰考试正常进行而使其他考生分心的；
-- failing to comply with the instructions of the invigilator or other member of the school’s staff responsible for the conduct of an examination/未能与监考官或考试中学校其他相关负责员工的指引相一致
-- impersonating another candidate/模仿其他考生；
-- including offensive material (such as some expressions or images which may insult someone or most people) in a script/在草稿纸上使用攻击性材料（会令某些人或大多数人感到侮辱的表达或图像）的；
-- stealing examination papers/偷窃考试试卷；
-- disclosing or discussing the content of an examination paper with a person outside the immediate community within 24 hours after the examination/在考试后24小时内同他人交谈试卷内容或者泄露考试内容；
-- exchanging, supporting, or attempting to support, the passing on of information that is or could be related to the examination. / 交换，支持或试图支持传递与考试相关的内容
ü any other behaviour that gains an unfair advantage for a candidate or that affects the results of another candidate, such as: /任何其他行为，可能导致考生获得不公平利益的，或影响到其他考生结果，如：
-- making up data for an assignment/在作业中捏制虚假信息的；
-- falsifying a CAS record/在创造、行动和服务活动中弄虚作假的；
-- paying someone to help you write your papers such as written assignments, IAs, EEs, and TOK essays /付钱让别人代写论文的。如书面作业、内部评估文章、拓展论文及知识论论文；
-- using essay-writing services (ghost-written or purchased essays) offering assistance in writing essays or other assessment materials/ 使用为撰写论文或其他评估材料提供帮助的论文写作服务（代笔写作或购买论文）
-- using artificial intelligence (AI) tools to produce the assessments / 使用人工智能工具完成作业
-- using software to improve language and grammar in language acquisition / 在语言习得课程里使用软件提高语言和语法
-- writing essays in one language then translating them to be submitted to the IB in another language (basic tools are permitted, such as bilingual dictionaries) / 用一种语言写作，再翻译成另一种语言提交给IB（允许使用基础工具，如双语词典）
School Maladministration /学校管理不善
The IB defines school maladministration as an action by an IB World School or any individual associated with an IB World School that infringes IB rules and regulations, and potentially threatens the integrity of IB examinations and assessments. It can happen before, during or after the completion of an assessment component or completion of an examination. (Academic integrity policy, Page 3)
国际文凭组织将学校管理不善定义如下：IB世界学校或与IB世界学校有关联的个人违反IB规则和条例，并可能威胁IB考试和评估的完整性的行为。它可能发生在评估组成部分完成或考试完成之前、期间或之后。（《学术诚实政策》第3页）
School maladministration may occur during the (Academic integrity policy, Page 19, Page 26-29):
学校管理不善可能出现在以下过程：（《学术诚信政策》第19页、第26-29页）：
ü Completion of coursework /作业完成过程
-- providing excessive assistance to their students during the coursework production process / 学生完成作业的过程中，学科老师提供过多的帮助
-- providing undue assistance to candidates such as over-editing, templating, or manipulating finished pieces of work for improvement / 向考生提供不适当的帮助，如过度编辑或模板化或修改已完成的作品
-- allowing the submission of work produced by third parties such as teachers, tutors, parents/legal guardians and peers / 允许提交由教师、导师、父母/法定监护人和同龄人等第三方的作品
-- having high proportion of plagiarism cases—more than 20% of cohort for a component / 有很高比例的剽窃内容——一个评估部分超过20%的考生相同或相近
-- uploading submission errors, such as duplicate files, identified by the IB during the assessment process / IB在评估过程中发现的上传提交错误，如重复文件
During the examination /考试过程
-- school poorly trains invigilators / 学校没有对监考人员进行充分的培训
-- school doesn’t store examination materials securely / 学校没有安全地储存考试材料
--school allows the teacher responsible for the subject being examined to enter the examination hall and assist their students / 学校允许考试科目的任课老师进入考场并协助学生
--school access the content of the examination before the scheduled time / 学校在规定时间之前获取考试内容
-- number of invigilators is insufficient /监考人员数量不足
--invigilators do not ensure that students’ calculators are set to examination mode / 监考人员没有确保学生的计算器设置为考试模式
--invigilators fail to check the materials that the students take to their desks, and include non-permitted dictionaries or data booklets / 监考人员没有检查学生带到课桌上的材料，包括未经允许的字典或数据手册
--invigilators fail to ask candidates to surrender unauthorized materials before the start of the examination /监考人员没有在考试开始前要求考生交出未经授权的材料
--invigilators allow candidates to use or refer to prohibited materials such as notes, and the sharing of prompts during IB assessments / 监考人员允许考生使用或参考被禁止的材料，例如在IB评估期间使用笔记和共享提示
--invigilators allow candidates to share materials or communicate during the examination / 监考人员允许考生在考试期间分享材料或交流
--invigilators fail to monitor student bathroom visits / 监考人员未能监控学生上厕所的情况
--invigilators grant additional time to students without authorization from the IB /监考人员在未经IB授权的情况下给予学生额外时间
-- school reschedules an examination without authorization / 学校未经授权重新安排考试。
-- invigilators assist candidates with the completion or the understanding of questions during the examination / 监考人员在考试期间协助考生完成或理解问题
-- school fails to maintain examination security / 学校未能维护考试安全
Acknowledging sources/承认出处
How can I make sure that I am not plagiarizing material? / 我如何确保我没有抄袭资料？
The simplest method of avoiding plagiarism is to honestly, accurately, and clearly acknowledge, by references in the body of your work and/or in a bibliography at the end, each and every piece of material you used in the production of your work. / 避免抄袭最简单的办法就是诚实、准确、清晰地承认在自己作品中所有引用文的出处，或者自己文章的最后写明每段引用资料出处。
All ideas and work of other persons, regardless of their source, must be acknowledged/无论资源来自何处，只要是别人的主意或作品都必须予以承认。
CD Rom, email messages, web sites on the Internet and any other electronic media must be treated in the same way as books and journals / 光碟、邮件或因特网上信息，及其他电子媒介的信息必须和书籍杂志同等对待。
The sources of all photographs, maps, illustrations, computer programmes, data, graphs, audio-visual and similar material must be acknowledged / 引用所有照片、地图、标注、计算机项目、数据、图表、视听材料或其他类似材料都必须予以承认。
Passages that are quoted verbatim must be enclosed within quotation marks and references provided / 引用的翻译文段必须用引文标注，并写明参考书籍。
All works of art, film, dance, music, theatre arts or visual arts must have their source/origin acknowledged / 所有美术、戏剧、舞蹈、音乐、舞台艺术或其他视觉艺术作品也必须引用出处。
Always use Turnitin in accordance with the school’s regulations /按照学校规定使用Turnitin软件。
Materials cannot be paraphrased without acknowledging the source /未承认出处的资料不可以进行改述。
Any text, image, or graph included in a piece of work has been copied or paraphrased from an AI tool must be appropriately referenced in the body of the work and be added to the bibliography. / 作业中的任何从人工智能工具复制或转述的文本、图像或图表，必须在作品正文中适当引用，并添加到参考书目中。
Permitted collaboration/允许的协作：
Collaboration will be seen to include students working in groups in order to accomplish a task of shared goal. This permitted collaboration forms part of the assessment of students in the diploma programme, and all students are expected to participate in it at an equal level. Examples of such permitted collaboration include: / 为完成目标一致的共同任务，我们允许学生进行小组合作。这些被认可的协作形式形成学生文凭项目评估的一部分。我们期望所有的学生有同等程度上的参与。被认可的协助形式如下：
discussion with other students regarding issues raised by the assessment item. /针对评估项目产生的问题进行的，与其他同学的讨论；
discussion with other students regarding means by which to address the issues raised by the assessment item / 对解决评估项目中出现问题的不同方法，而与其他同学的讨论；
collaboration in the location of, and sharing sources of information relevant to the item of assessment / 根据评估项目中的共同的信息资源来进行的集体协作。
The following acts of collaboration are not permitted: / 以下协作形式是不允许的：
collaborating with other students or persons in the writing of all or part of the student’s submissions for the assessment item/与其他学生或人员协作，书写该生评估项目提交论文的部分或全部；
collaborating with other students or persons in the writing of all or part of any other student’s submissions for the assessment item / 与其他学生或人员合作写作，代替书写别的学生的评估项目提交论文的部分或全部；
Acknowledging original authorship (Harvard style)/承认作者原创性（哈佛风格）
There are many referencing styles used in acknowledging original authorship such as American Psychological Association (APA), Modern Language Association (MLA), Council of Biology Editors (CBE), Chicago, Harvard and many others. OECIS encourages the use of the Harvard reference style when acknowledging sources (Students can also use others referencing styles under the guide of subject teachers). The Harvard reference guide is available in the library and will be explicitly and regularly taught by teachers of subjects on offer in the school.
有许多种承认作者原创性的引文风格。如APA风格，MLA风格，CBE风格，芝加哥风格，哈佛风格等等。国际学校鼓励学生使用哈佛引用风格来承认出处（同学们也可以根据具体学科教师的指导使用其他风格）。同学们可以在图书馆中找到哈佛引文指导，我们学校的学科教师也会给明确地、定期地给学生进行教授。
The in-text citation should contain quotation marks using the referencing style already in use by the school and the citation should also contain the prompt given to the AI tool and the date the AI generated the text. / 文本引用应包含使用学校已在使用的引用样式的引号，引用还应包含给予人工智能工具的提示和人工智能生成文本的日期。
Enforcement of the policy/政策执行：
To ensure that this policy is adequately implemented and adhered to by all students and staff in the diploma programme, OECIS will use the Turnitin to monitor the academic integrity of all submitted works. The result of similarity of students’ work must be less than 10%. Students in the diploma programme will also be required to submit all drafts and notes taken with the final versions of their works.
为保证此项政策充分执行，并被大学预科段项目的所有学生及教师所遵守，国际学校使用Turnitin来监督学生提交论文的学术诚实。学生的文章相似度结果必须低于10%。大学预科段项目的学生也会被要求来提交所有论文的初稿和终稿的笔记。
School’s penalty for academic misconduct /学校对学术不诚实的惩罚措施
OECIS has zero tolerance for academic misconduct. If there is an established case of plagiarism against a student or a group of students after thorough investigation has been carried out, which shall involve the tendering of written statements by the student(s) and the teacher(s) that initiated the charge, the coordinator will send a situation report to the parents/guardians of the student(s) indicating that no grade will be awarded for that particular assessment. Should this happen in an internal assessment, no grade will lead to the denial of the IB diploma.
国际学校对学术不诚实为零容忍度。经过调查发现确实有个别或一群学生存在抄袭行为，我们会要求这位学生或这些学生进行书面论述，负责教师也需进行书面论述，学段协调员会给学生家长或监护人发送告知书，告知他们指定的该项评估没有分数。如果这项行为发生在内部评估环节，一门没有分数会导致学生无法获得国际文凭。
In addition to the recording of no grade, further disciplinary actions will be taken against the student or students, with the possibilities of a suspension or an expulsion from the school.
除了记录学生没有分数外，我们也会对该学生或该组学生进行其他纪律方面的措施，比如在学校停学甚至开除。
Appeal procedure/ 申诉程序
If a student feels wrongly accused and/or punished for academic misconduct, the student, within 5 working days, may send a written explanation to the coordinator stating reasons why the penalty should not be imposed. / 如果学生认为自己是被冤枉或不该被认为是学术不诚实，学生应该在五个工作日内，发送给学段协调员一个书面解释，说明理由为什么不该被罚。
The coordinator shall invite the teacher that initiated the charge to write another statement within 3 working days. Both statements shall then be forwarded to the principal to make a ruling on the case within 10 days of the appeal and decide whether (a) the act of misconduct was committed and (b) the punishment was appropriate. / 在三个工作日内，学段协调员应该邀请负责教师来进行讨论并写另外一份书面论述。(a)无论学生是否有不诚实行为，(b)无论惩罚是否恰当，在申诉发起的10日内所有的论述都应提交给校长, 做出最终裁决。
The ruling of the principal shall be final and not subject to further appeal. /校长的决定是最终裁决，不能再上诉。
Offences and their penalty (As outlined by IB)/违反政策及处罚（根据国际文凭组织主要原则）
The IB is very clear about the need for strict adherence to the principles of academic integrity and personal honesty which OECIS abides by. Article 21 of the General regulations: Diploma Programme states:/国际文凭组织对严格遵守学术诚实和个人诚信的相关规定有非常清晰的规定和要求。国际学校一直以来也严格遵守着。按照国际文凭组织的表述，通用法则第21条规定：
21.1 If questions arise about the authenticity of a candidate’s work before submission for assessment, the situation must be resolved within the school. If possible academic misconduct (for example, plagiarism, collusion) is identified after a candidate’s work has been submitted to the IB for assessment, the school’s DP coordinator must inform the IB as soon as possible. / 21.1如果在提交评估之前出现关于考生文章真实性的问题，必须在学校内解决问题。如果可能的学术不端行为（例如，剽窃，合谋）发生在考生的文章提交给IB进行评估后，学校的DP协调员必须尽快通知IB。
21.2 When a school, an examiner or the IB establishes evidence to suspect academic misconduct by a candidate, the school will be required to conduct an investigation and provide the IB with statements and other relevant documentation concerning the case. If a school fails to support the investigation into possible academic misconduct, no grade will be awarded to the candidate in the subject(s) concerned. /21.2当学校，考官或国际文凭组织有证据怀疑学术不端行为时，学校将被要求进行调查并向国际文凭组织提供有关案件的陈述和其他相关文件。如果学校未能支持对可能的学术不端行为进行调查，相关考生的相关学科将不会获得评分。
21.3 If the IB notifies a school that a candidate is suspected of academic misconduct and that the IB has the intention of initiating an investigation, at the discretion of the head of school it is permissible for the candidate to be withdrawn from the session or from the subject(s) in which academic misconduct may have occurred. However, at the discretion of the IB the investigation into the suspected academic misconduct by the candidate may still proceed and a decision be reached on whether to uphold or dismiss academic misconduct. If a candidate is withdrawn from a subject no mark for that subject may contribute to the award of a grade in a future examination session. /21.3如果国际文凭组织通知学校有考生涉嫌学术不端行为且国际文凭组织有意开始调查，学校校长可酌情决定让考生退出该考试季或涉嫌发生学术不端行为的学科考试。但是，根据国际文凭组织的判断，对考生涉嫌的学术不端行为的调查可继续进行，并就是否维护或驳回学术不端行为达成决定。如果考生退出某一科目，该科目在未来的考试中将不会被给予分数。
21.4 Candidates suspected of academic misconduct must be invited, through the school’s DP coordinator, to present a written statement that addresses the suspicion of academic misconduct. If a candidate declines to present a statement, the investigation and decision on whether the candidate is in breach of regulations will still proceed. /21.4涉嫌学术不端行为的考生必须在学校DP协调员的要求下提交书面陈述，以解决学术不端行为的怀疑。即使考生拒绝提出陈述，关于考生是否违反规定的调查和决定仍将继续进行。
21.5 The majority of cases of suspected academic misconduct will be presented to a sub-committee of the Final Award Committee. The sub-committee will normally comprise IB staff, school representatives, and chief/deputy chief examiners, but any group or combination of these persons may make decisions on cases subject to the approval of the Final Award Committee. The sub-committee will be chaired by the chair or vice-chair of the Final Award Committee, or a chief examiner nominated by the vice-chair. /21.5大多数涉嫌学术不端行为的案件将提交给最终裁决委员会的小组委员会。小组委员会通常包含IB员工，学校代表，和首席/副首席审查员，这些委员或由部分委员组成的工作小组都可以在最终裁决委员会批准的情况下对案件作出决定。小组委员会的主席将由最终裁决委员会的主席或副主席，或副主席提名的主审官担任。
21.6 Decisions of the sub-committee are made on behalf of and under the supervision of the Final Award Committee. After reviewing all statements and evidence collected during the investigation, the subcommittee will decide whether to dismiss the suspicion of academic misconduct, uphold it, or ask for further investigations to be made. If the sub-committee is unable to reach a decision, then the case will be referred to the Final Award Committee. /21.6小组委员会的决定是在最终裁决委员会的监督下进行的。根据调查期间收集的所有陈述和证据，小组委员会将决定是否驳回对学术不端行为的怀疑，坚持怀疑或要求进一步调查。如果小组委员会无法做出决定，案件将被提交给最终裁决委员会。
21.7 If the sub-committee decides that a case of academic misconduct has been established, a penalty will be applied in the subject(s) concerned. The penalty will, in the judgment of the sub-committee, be proportionate with the severity of the misconduct. / 21.7如小组委员会确定学术不端行为成立，相关学科的成绩将收到影响。根据小组委员会的判断，影响程度将与学术不当行为的严重程度成比例。
21.8 If no grade is issued for a subject that contributes to a candidate’s IB Diploma, no IB Diploma will be awarded to the candidate. DP Course Results will be awarded for other subjects in which no academic misconduct has occurred. Except in cases of serious or repeated misconduct, the candidate will be permitted to register for future examination sessions, which may include the session that follows six months later, if the relevant registration deadlines are met. In the case of an IB Diploma Candidate, if the session in which the academic misconduct has been established is the candidate’s third examination session towards achieving the award of the IB Diploma, no further IB examination sessions will be permitted. /21.8如果考生的任何一门IB文凭考试科目没有获得成绩，该考生将无法获得IB文凭。其他没有发生学术不端行为的科目依然可以获得 DP课程成绩。除了严重或重复的不当行为外，考生将被允许注册参加未来的考试，但该考试必须在六个月之后，如果满足相关的注册截止日期。如果考生在第三次IB考试中行为不当，那考生将无法再参加考试。
21.9 If the candidate has already been found in breach of regulations in any previous session, this will normally lead to disqualification from participation in any future examination session. /21.9如果在前一次考试中发现考生违反规定，考生将不能注册未来的任何考试。
21.10 If there is substantive evidence, the IB is entitled to conduct an investigation into academic misconduct after a candidate’s results have been issued. If academic misconduct is subsequently established by the Final Award Committee, or its sub-committee, the candidate’s grade for the subject(s) concerned may be withdrawn from the candidate which will also result in the withdrawal of his or her IB Diploma where applicable. /21.10如果有实质性证据，国际文凭组织有权在考生成绩发布后对学术不端行为进行调查。如果最终裁决委员会或其小组委员会随后确定了学术不端行为，该考生的相关科目的成绩将被撤回，这也将导致该考生的IB文凭被撤销。
References/参考文献
Academic integrity policy, IB, last update: 15/03/2023 / 学术诚信政策，国际文凭，2023年
https://resources.ibo.org/ib/topic/Academic-honesty/works/edu_11162-58121?lang=en
DP assessment procedures 2023, IB, last update: 23/05/2023 / 2023年大学预科项目评估流程细则，国际文凭，2023年
https://resources.ibo.org/dp/works/dp_11162-423301?
Academic integrity for internal assessments, IB, last update: 2020 / 校内评估的学术诚信，国际文凭，2020年
https://resources.ibo.org/dp/topic/Checklists/resource/11162-413942?lang=en
Assessment principles and practices--quality assessments in a digital age (Section B: Integrity of the assessment), IB, last update: 20/12/2022 /评估原则和实践--数字时代的质量评估（B部分：评估的诚信），国际文凭，2022年
https://resources.ibo.org/ib/works/edu_11162-47165?lang=en
Ideas for organization and wording are also derived from the following IB diploma schools’ academic honesty policies:/也引用以下国际文凭成员学校的学术诚实政策中的一些观点和看法：
- Copenhagen International School, Copenhagen, Denmark/丹麦，哥本哈根国际学校
- Yokohama International School, Yokohama, Japan/日本横滨，横滨国际学校
视频号